Compliance, inside the engineering loop.
Crado is the evidence layer for regulated hardware. It keeps every test result, design change and regulation tied to the product revision it belongs to.
It reads.
Every value Crado reads from a report shows its page.
It checks.
Margin is measured minus limit, from a versioned rule set.
Agents investigate.
Read reports, organise the evidence, propose likely causes with their evidence.
Unknown stays unknown.
Each likely cause lists the evidence for it and the facts it still needs.
No guaranteed passes. No certification determinations. Unknown stays unknown.
Hardware compliance, as practised today, is falling behind. Products change every sprint: firmware, layouts, suppliers. The evidence that shows they still meet the rules changes a few times a year, in a lab, in a PDF. The knowledge that connects the two lives in email threads, spreadsheets and one engineer's memory. The result is retests nobody planned, fixes nobody can trace, and new designs that repeat old failures.
Crado is building the evidence layer for regulated hardware: one record between your engineering team and the regulations your product must meet.
It reads. It checks. It remembers. Agents organise the evidence, rules check the numbers, and your engineers make every decision.
A record your engineers can check
Every change should arrive with its evidence.
Engineers should design, test and decide. Finding out what a change did to the evidence should not take a week of searching.
A record that follows the revision.
Every report, confirmed fact, likely cause and change is filed with the product revision it belongs to, so the next one starts from what the last one learned.
Agents investigate. Engineers decide.
In a regulated product, a confident wrong answer costs more than no answer. Agents propose and cite, a deterministic engine does the arithmetic, and nothing is marked known until a person confirms it.
Confirm what was read.
Every value Crado reads from a report shows its page. Nothing counts as known until you confirm it.
Numbers from rules, not prose.
Margin is measured minus limit, from a versioned rule set.
See what is still missing.
Each likely cause lists the evidence for it and the facts it still needs.
One record. Agents for every stage.
Specialist agents that each own one part of the compliance work. Every output cites its evidence.
- LIVEWhen a test fails
EMC investigator
Ranks likely causes of a failed radiated-emissions test, each with its evidence, and suggests the next test.
"Why did Rev D fail at 144.2 MHz?" - ROADMAPBefore a change
Change reviewer
Shows which evidence and certifications a design change touches.
"What does ECO-214 do to our FCC evidence?" - ROADMAPBefore a retest
Retest planner
Proposes the smallest set of checks that settles an open question.
"What would settle the 96 MHz risk?" - ROADMAPWith the lab
Lab liaison
Keeps test plans, samples and lab threads in step with each revision.
"What did we agree with the lab about the cable?" - ROADMAPBefore review
Compliance writer
Drafts review packages for engineers to check and approve.
"Draft the Rev E review package." - ROADMAPAfter shipping
Evidence auditor
Finds evidence that went stale after a change, before an auditor does.
"Which Rev D results no longer apply to Rev E?"
What Crado checks today
Crado refuses a comparison when the test distance or detector does not match the limit.
Every change should arrive with its evidence.
Engineers should design, test and decide. Finding out what a change did to the evidence should not take a week of searching.
A record that follows the revision.
Every report, confirmed fact, likely cause and change is filed with the product revision it belongs to, so the next one starts from what the last one learned.
Agents investigate. Engineers decide.
In a regulated product, a confident wrong answer costs more than no answer.
Agents propose and cite, a deterministic engine does the arithmetic, and nothing is marked known until a person confirms it.
Before you trust Crado with your evidence
What engineering teams ask first.
Bring us your next design change.
Join the waitlist. We invite engineering teams in small groups, starting with one of your own test reports.